here we go again with Williams

Were we not supposed to do something with our latest readings and something about the paper we were given to look at? I could be wrong here, but, what the hell?

This paper was really opinionated and not really cohisive and clear. In the end, I wasn't too sure what the assingment was, because there was so many different topics.

At the end of chapter four, there is a qoute that talks about having a good first line, and then not knowing what to do with the rest of the paper. That's what happened right here. It started off good, and then just bottomed out. The author completely strayed away from her topic (if there was one) and really ends up being a description of many different things. Well, it would be a description if it wasn't for all the opinions.